10/31/2023 0 Comments Fuji 56mm 1.2 portraitsI would recommend the X-H or X-T series, and if you plan on using anything else, I recommend purchasing an after-market metal grip. I found it to be more so on the X-T20 than the X-T4, but you will want a significant grip if you can. I guess speaking of size, it’s important to note that this lens does make other camera bodies extremely front-heavy. It’s a 67mm thread, so it is quite easy to bump into the front of things without realizing it… One Note: With this much glass (and a very large front element), I would recommend purchasing a UV filter on the front of this lens. (But does contains focus breathing as you will see in various other reviews.) I would feel confident in traveling the world with this lens…Īlso, the manual-focus throw was very good, and it was not too far from minimum to infinity. I did not see any major spots for water to enter into the lens, and it does have a weather gasket. Truth be told, it feels like a small-brick attached to the X-T4 (which I test all lenses on), but I have no doubt in the longevity of this lens. The build quality of the 56mm F1.2 WR is exceptional. The jack of all trades for the telephoto zoom options, the Fujifilm 50-140 is the best-performing lens in regards to sharpness The 135mm equivalent lens us faster to focus as it contains linear motors, and it’s a popular focal length. ![]() This is the other popular prime telephoto within the Fuji XF mount, and it is probably the 56mm F1.2 WR’s direct competitor. The first version of this lens is slow, but it can be found for less than $500 in a used state. The 50mm F2 and the 23mm F2 make a formidable street lens combination. The budget “Fuji-cron” version of the portrait lens, the 50mm F2 has fast autofocusing speeds and it is weather resistant. Sure, anything from a 16mm to a 200mm could act as a portrait lens in a pinch, but we should probably only compare the 56mm F1.2 WR to other “specifically designed” options. But you might be asking yourself…Įvery single budget is covered by the XF ecosystem, but only in regards to portrait lenses. This new lens gained weather resistance, a closer focusing distance, and is quite a bit sharper, making it the best Fujifilm lens for portraits. This is when Fujifilm re-entered the space with a re-fresh. For example, it did lack water-resistance, but it was very slow to focus, had a slightly mediocre close focusing distance, and even was not sharp-enough for the new 40 MP arriving on the X-H2 and X-T5. This lens resulted in numerous “money shots,” but as the X-Trans IV sensor arrived with quick but unreliable autofocus, Fujifilm photographers started to notice other things about this lens. It had a relatively shallow depth of field (as good as it could get for APS-C), had good enough sharpness, and also included what some people called “character.” ![]() And to the great revere of many, they created a perfect lens. ![]() Now, similar to some of the other first Fujifilm lenses (the XF 18-135mm and 35mm F1.4), the 56mm F1.2 is one of those “staple” focal lengths (85mm Full-Frame), that Fujifilm attempted to make within the first couple of years. Whenever I examine (or anyone, really), the average Fujifilm XF photographer is going to be pleasantly surprised at the numerous amount of XF portraits lenses that exist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |